This looks to be another issue of semantics - to me "support" means to provide material assistance, in terms of cash or kind. Downloading content, if anything, does the opposite since it increases a site's bandwidth usage.Effidian wrote:It isn't disabling the check that is supporting piracy, it is downloading the crack in the first place.
And how, practically, is a crack author supposed to verify authenticity beyond making their crack reliant on having the game installed? You are asking them to do what software publishers themselves cannot (you don't have to "prove" purchase prior to downloading an official patch) which seems quite unrealistic.Effidian wrote:I very much doubt that the authors of cracks are doing it for paying customers of the game. Do you need to provide proof of purchase to download the crack? Obviously not. You seriously believe that people that write cracks are doing it with the intention it should only be used on games you pay for?
Virtually every crack readme file asks people to purchase games that they like and every responsible site makes the point that cracks are for purchased software only (more proof of "good intentions" than anyone can supply of the opposite). Beyond that, it has to be left to individuals' consciences, so it is as reasonable to blame crack authors for subsequent abuse as it is to blame software authors for any abuse of their products (e.g. using a security scanner to break into a system).
As Rollor has noted, the crack authors aren't receiving any more money from your "vendor" than the original software authors, so they are as much victims of commercial piracy here. In addition, no-CD cracks are not needed for pirated copies (assuming the copy was accurate enough to pass any CD check).Aganazer wrote:It is money. Every game I ever bought in Thailand had the crack burned onto the CD with the game. Those CD's would never pass the copy protection so you need the crack. There is money in cracks.