Page 1 of 2
Diablo
Posted: August 17th, 2006, 2:46 am
by Sanctus
Wath do you think about this game?
I think is kinda booring
Like I played till chaper III and then I fell asleep on my keyboard ^^
Posted: August 17th, 2006, 8:14 am
by BasiliskWrangler
I personally enjoyed Diablo/Diablo II quite a bit, although I would barely call them RPGs. Still, I would say the series is one of the more enjoyable "Action pseudo-RPGs" ever made...and I don't like Action pseudo-RPGs.
Posted: August 17th, 2006, 10:16 am
by Sanctus
Yeah is mearly a quarter rpg
Oh and I didn't mention it but I was speaking about diablo II (though I finished diablo I)
Posted: August 17th, 2006, 9:16 pm
by cubgrace
What these guys are trying to do. Diablo should never be mention in this forum.
Posted: August 18th, 2006, 2:54 am
by Sanctus
why? Because its a hack 'n' slash?
Posted: August 18th, 2006, 7:13 am
by Ledorax
Hack and slash games like diablo are great fun, for a while. But when you reach the high levels, most of them just get plain boring. All you do is hack away at big monsters with extreme hit points and all spells seem to do the same thing.
At least that's what I think.
Posted: August 18th, 2006, 7:15 am
by Sanctus
Yeah diablo 2 got me bored really fast...
But... diablo 1 seemed to be more fun (although the graphics...)
Posted: August 18th, 2006, 8:49 am
by cubgrace
I kinda like the Diablos. But I think whta these guys are doing is in a much deeper scope of things. RPG RPG!!! I think we might be for getting what those letters stand for!!!!
Posted: August 18th, 2006, 9:21 am
by Sanctus
To me they got the R out of the RPG (but DS1 and 2 brought it back)
Posted: August 19th, 2006, 8:38 am
by Rollor
Ledorax wrote:Hack and slash games like diablo are great fun, for a while. But when you reach the high levels, most of them just get plain boring. All you do is hack away at big monsters with extreme hit points and all spells seem to do the same thing.
Agree..
diablo 1 seemed to be more fun (although the graphics...)
I thought people on this forum didn't care that much about graphics:/
It's pretty clear to everyone that Eschalon is no oblivion or gothic 3
Posted: August 19th, 2006, 12:46 pm
by Sanctus
Yeah but I still care about the gfx...
I don't need games like oblivion(though it would be nice) but not as bad as pacman(graphics speeking)
Posted: August 19th, 2006, 2:31 pm
by bargeral
I too have trouble with older games because of the older graphics. I'm learning to overcome this. The trick with Diablo was this: play it when it was new.

Posted: August 20th, 2006, 2:47 am
by Sanctus
Correct but... some games are good even if they are old

Posted: August 21st, 2006, 12:24 pm
by Gallifrey
I actually find a lot of newer games have graphics which put me off. I like the look of older games, I like 2D sprites and so forth.
All in all, I'm not picky about whether graphics are old, new, 2D or 3D, just as long as it looks good, to me.
Posted: August 22nd, 2006, 8:46 am
by Rollor
I'm playing oblivion with my 9600 I can't care about graphics even if I wanted to
