Diablo

Sanctus · Post by **Sanctus** » August 17th, 2006, 2:46 am

Wath do you think about this game?
I think is kinda booring
Like I played till chaper III and then I fell asleep on my keyboard ^^

YouTube · Post by **BasiliskWrangler** » August 17th, 2006, 8:14 am

I personally enjoyed Diablo/Diablo II quite a bit, although I would barely call them RPGs. Still, I would say the series is one of the more enjoyable "Action pseudo-RPGs" ever made...and I don't like Action pseudo-RPGs.

Sanctus · Post by **Sanctus** » August 17th, 2006, 10:16 am

Yeah is mearly a quarter rpg
Oh and I didn't mention it but I was speaking about diablo II (though I finished diablo I)

cubgrace · Post by **cubgrace** » August 17th, 2006, 9:16 pm

What these guys are trying to do. Diablo should never be mention in this forum.

Sanctus · Post by **Sanctus** » August 18th, 2006, 2:54 am

why? Because its a hack 'n' slash?

Ledorax · Post by **Ledorax** » August 18th, 2006, 7:13 am

Hack and slash games like diablo are great fun, for a while. But when you reach the high levels, most of them just get plain boring. All you do is hack away at big monsters with extreme hit points and all spells seem to do the same thing.

At least that's what I think.

Sanctus · Post by **Sanctus** » August 18th, 2006, 7:15 am

Yeah diablo 2 got me bored really fast...
But... diablo 1 seemed to be more fun (although the graphics...)

cubgrace · Post by **cubgrace** » August 18th, 2006, 8:49 am

I kinda like the Diablos. But I think whta these guys are doing is in a much deeper scope of things. RPG RPG!!! I think we might be for getting what those letters stand for!!!!

Sanctus · Post by **Sanctus** » August 18th, 2006, 9:21 am

To me they got the R out of the RPG (but DS1 and 2 brought it back)

Rollor · Post by **Rollor** » August 19th, 2006, 8:38 am

Ledorax wrote:Hack and slash games like diablo are great fun, for a while. But when you reach the high levels, most of them just get plain boring. All you do is hack away at big monsters with extreme hit points and all spells seem to do the same thing.

Agree..

diablo 1 seemed to be more fun (although the graphics...)

I thought people on this forum didn't care that much about graphics:/
It's pretty clear to everyone that Eschalon is no oblivion or gothic 3

Sanctus · Post by **Sanctus** » August 19th, 2006, 12:46 pm

Yeah but I still care about the gfx...
I don't need games like oblivion(though it would be nice) but not as bad as pacman(graphics speeking)

bargeral · Post by **bargeral** » August 19th, 2006, 2:31 pm

I too have trouble with older games because of the older graphics. I'm learning to overcome this. The trick with Diablo was this: play it when it was new.

Sanctus · Post by **Sanctus** » August 20th, 2006, 2:47 am

Correct but... some games are good even if they are old

Gallifrey · Post by **Gallifrey** » August 21st, 2006, 12:24 pm

I actually find a lot of newer games have graphics which put me off. I like the look of older games, I like 2D sprites and so forth.

All in all, I'm not picky about whether graphics are old, new, 2D or 3D, just as long as it looks good, to me.

Rollor · Post by **Rollor** » August 22nd, 2006, 8:46 am

I'm playing oblivion with my 9600 I can't care about graphics even if I wanted to